With the news today that Conor McNicholas, the editor of the spin-off mag Top Gear has resigned after only 9 months, does this mean that the 37 year old editor was Too Mature for this licence-money wasting programme?
There's a TV programme called "Are You Brighter Than A 10 Year Old", most 10 year olds ARE brighter than those 3 idiots who try to present this so-called motor programme.
That Conor chap had a damn good pedigree in publishing and only lasted 9 months with them 3, read into it youselves. Nuff said.
I read somewhere recently that the Top Gear programmes were the most costly progammes produced by BBC2, how can the BBC justify continuing to spend our licence money on such trash?
There's a TV programme called "Are You Brighter Than A 10 Year Old", most 10 year olds ARE brighter than those 3 idiots who try to present this so-called motor programme.
That Conor chap had a damn good pedigree in publishing and only lasted 9 months with them 3, read into it youselves. Nuff said.
Perhaps we may find the BBC will do the job for us and cut out this very costly programme in their economy cuts.
I read somewhere recently that the Top Gear programmes were the most costly progammes produced by BBC2, how can the BBC justify continuing to spend our licence money on such trash?